Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Development Corporation in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute - High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside for Reconsideration.

The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals filed by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and the State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Following Constitution Bench Interpretation Overruling Earlier Precedent.

The dispute concerned a land acquisition matter where the Land Acquisition Collector and another appellant challenged the Delhi High Court's judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Overruling Precedent Based on Non-Payment Alone.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 30.05.2016 by the High Court of Delhi, which allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Apportionment Dispute Among Co-owners. Court holds that the Land Acquisition Court has jurisdiction to decide title and apportion compensation among co-owners under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a dispute among the children of Shripad Deo regarding the apportionment of compensation awarded by the State of Maharashtra for acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in lapse of proceedings.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...