Search Results for "investigation detention period"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition for De-freezing of Bank Account in Alleged Crypto Currency Fraud Case. Petitioner Claims Innocence and Non-Compliance with Section 102 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, a businessman engaged in oil trading, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Extension Order in MCOCA Case for Non-Compliance with Section 21(2)(b) — Default Bail Granted. Extension granted on application of Investigating Officer instead of Public Prosecutor's report, and without hearing accused, held illegal.

The appellants were arrested in Crime No. 242/2023 by Wardha City Police for offences under Sections 307, 143, 147, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dacoity Conspiracy Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Preparation. Petitioners' names were shown as absconding in FIR under Sections 399 and 402 IPC without any material to show they were part of any assembly to commit dacoity.

The petitioners, Imran Khan @ Imran Pasha and Imran Pasha, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...