KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "interim possession"
3903 result(s) found
Found 3903 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...
- 82
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 87
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 116
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 99
High Court
- 57
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.
16 Jun 2026The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...
- 123
High Court
- 96
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Public Interest Litigation for Rejuvenation of Godavari River Due to Extensive Pollution — Directs Implementation of NEERI Recommendations and Preventive Measures. Pollution of Godavari River by untreated sewage, industrial effluents, and religious activities violates public trust doctrine and Article 51A(g); preventive steps ordered under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
18 Dec 2018This public interest litigation was filed by citizens of Nashik seeking directions to clean and prevent pollution of river Godavari, the second longes...
- 75
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court Ruling That Coal India Limited Lacked Authority to Notify Interim Coal Policy and Collect 20% Additional Price from Non-Core Linked Consumers. Appeal Challenges Finding That the Interim Coal Policy Dated 15.12.2006 Imposing a 20% Increase Over Notified Price for Linked Non-Core Sector Consumers Was Without Authority Under the Colliery Control Order Regime and Violative of Article 14.
1 Jan 1970This appeal before the Supreme Court of India arose from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta dated 04.04.2012, which dismissed an appeal by Coal ...
