Search Results for "declaration under Section 306"

317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Cruelty Case. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 498A, 201 IPC Upheld Due to Lack of Reliable Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.11.2000 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Teacher Challenging Removal from Service — Upholds Single Judge's Order. Appellant failed to establish permanent appointment and termination was not stigmatic, hence no violation of natural justice.

The appellant, Smt. Sujathamma R, was employed as a teacher at Sri Vani Education Center. She challenged her removal from service by filing W.P.No.233...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl - Upholds Conviction Under Sections 376, 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl on 5th September 2013. The victim, a student of ITI, was last seen by her mother at Asa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Husband in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Manohar Rashmaji Bochra, who was the husband of the deceased Sheetal alias ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver and Interim Compensation in Property Dispute. Court holds that mere filing of affidavits does not establish grave urgency warranting appointment of receiver or direction for deposit of interim compensation at an interim stage.

The appellant, Ramesh Sippy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking possession of Flat No.5/B in Shree Vijayaa Bhavan, Mumbai, claiming ownersh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds lower appellate court's decree confirming plaintiff's title and possession based on sale deed and adverse possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The original plaintiff (sin...