Search Results for "condonation of delay"

627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award as Barred by Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Petitions Filed Beyond Three Months from Receipt of Supplementary Award Cannot Be Entertained.

The petitioner, M/s. P.C.V. Traders and M/s. M.C. Vora and Co., filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement Despite Delay in Civil Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Delay Condoned on Sufficient Cause with Costs.

The petitioner, Dhiraj Vijaykant Kudale, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders passed by the t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Setting Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order. Delay of Over Four Years in Filing Application to Restore Dismissed MJC Not Sufficiently Explained, Limitation Cannot Be Ignored.

The petitioner, Hetram Kashinath Shende, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Order Dismissing Appeal Due to Advocate's No Instructions, Restores Appeal. Court Condoned 828-Day Delay as Applicant Was Misled by Advocate's Assurances.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.P. Mehta (the applicant) seeking condonation of a delay of 828 days in filing the motion and recall of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Continuing Cause of Action and Sufficient Cause for Delay Established Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Windsor Machines Ltd., challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 27 January 2012, which allowed an application for condon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendant's Counter Claim Despite Limitation Concerns in Summary Suit — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact Not to Be Decided on Affidavits

The case arises from a Summary Suit instituted in 1997 by Tube Investment of India Limited (Plaintiff) against Gulf Oil India Limited (Defendant) on t...