High Court of Bombay Hears First Appeal No. 1156 of 2015 Concerning Charitable Trusts and Municipal Corporation. Appeal impugns judgment of lower authority under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and related statutes.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"
407 result(s) found
Found 407 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.
4 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...
- 638
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election Petition Allowed for Non-Compliance with Section 16 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Failure to File Election Expenses Within 30 Days Renders Election Void.
17 May 2021The petitioner, Ashok Rajaram Raul, was declared elected as a councilor from Ward No.12-D of Thane Municipal Corporation in the general elections held...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Illegal Demolition by Municipal Corporation Without Due Process — Directions Issued for Reconstruction or Compensation. Demolition of structure without notice violates principles of natural justice and guidelines under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
26 Mar 2018The petitioner, Deepak S. Kamble, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the demolition of his structures by...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Reconstruction of Demolished Structures in MCGM Demolition Case — Violation of Natural Justice as No Notice Given Under MMC Act. Court held that demolition without notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 is illegal and directed restoration of status quo ante.
26 Mar 2018The petitioners, M/s. Sunbeam High Tech Developers Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Disconnection of Water Supply Without Individual Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Water Supply Within 48 Hours as Disconnection Without Notice to Occupant Is Not Permissible.
24 Dec 2013The appellant, Balkrishna Dwivedi, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai dated 28.10.2013 refusing to grant ad-interim reli...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Injunction in Municipal Notice Challenge. Notice under Section 354 of MMC Act for demolition of dilapidated building held valid despite alleged lack of service to occupier, as reconstruction of already demolished room cannot be ordered.
22 Oct 2013The appellants, Sumitra Shashikant Khokhani, Vishesh Shashikant Khokhani, and Sanjay Shashikant Khokhani, were occupants of room No. D-4 admeasuring 2...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Unaided Private School to Fix Fees Subject to Reasonable Regulation. Fee Fixation Must Be Transparent and Not Excessive Under Grant in Aid Code and Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987.
17 Mar 2005The petitioners, Hindi Vidya Bhavan Society and another, are a society registered under the Societies' Registration Act, 1860 and a public trust under...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction — Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court held that the impugned letter rejecting the appellant's reply was not a final order and that the appellant was entitled to a hearing before any adverse action.
22 Feb 2005The appellant, Pravin Jagdish Bhargav, filed a suit challenging a letter dated 30th January 1995 from the Deputy Municipal Commissioner, Zone-III, of ...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Section 10 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Directors Not In Charge of Day-to-Day Business at Relevant Time Cannot Be Prosecuted Without Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by directors and a company against criminal proceedings initiated under the Prevention of F...
- 137
