Search Results for "zamindari abolition"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities in Pond Land Dispute. High Court Exceeded Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 by Reappreciating Evidence Without Perversity.

The dispute pertains to Khasra No.103 (formerly Khasra No.84) in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. In 1970, the land was recorded as 'Johad (Pond)' in revenue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Quashing Petition in Agreement to Sell Dispute — Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Prosecution. Breach of Contract Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC Without Fraudulent Intent at Inception.

The present appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing an application under Section 482 CrPC filed by the appellants, Kunti a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...