Search Results for "window period"

576 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 576 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanent Employment from LIC — No Right to Regularisation for Temporary Employees. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to permanent status or scheme for absorption under Article 226.

The petitioner, Pramod V. Bhatre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a directio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Default Bail in POCSO Case — Issues Framed on Section 193(2) BNSS. The Court Examines Whether Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days Entitles Accused to Statutory Bail Despite 90-Day Limit Under Section 187(3)(i) BNSS.

The case arose from a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the BNSS, challenging orders denying de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Caste Category Change in NEET-PG 2025 Application After Deadline. No provision exists for modification of category after last date of application, and the application process must attain finality.

The petitioner, Dr. C. Anusha, a medical graduate who completed MBBS, appeared for the NEET-PG 2025 examination for admission to postgraduate medical ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Answers Reference on Entitlement of Second Wife to Family Pension under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court examines Rule 116(6)(a)(i) in light of Hindu Marriage Act and personal laws.

The matter came before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a Division Bench to resolve the question whether the second wife of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Dispute involves multiple hotel management agreements and the applicability of arbitration clauses after partial setting aside of a prior award.

The dispute arises from a series of hotel management agreements concerning a hotel at Lonavala owned by petitioner Laguna Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (formerly ...