Search Results for "wildlife protection"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Mutt's Plea for Elephant Ownership Renewal and Translocation Subject to Welfare Compliance. Court Directs Joint Inspection of New Elephant Care Facility Before Renewal of Certificates Under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Tamil Nadu Captive Elephant Rules, 2011.

The petitioner, Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, a Hindu religious Mutt, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Conservation Case Against Railway Land Development. NGT's Finding That Land Is Not Forest Land Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Upheld, as Appellants Failed to Prove Land Met Statutory Definition and Provided Unauthorized Evidence.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dismissing an original application challenging a Request for Proposal (RFP) issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

The petitioners, twelve individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wildlife Product Seizure Case but Reduces Sentence from 6 to 3 Years. Conscious possession of tiger parts established; discrepancies in trap proceedings not sufficient to create doubt; sentence reduced considering young age and time served.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the conviction of Rajesh and Makbool Ahmed under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for illegal ...