Search Results for "unauthorized structures"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "unauthorized structures"

174 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 174 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Order Against Municipal Corporation for Breach of Undertaking in Unauthorized Construction Case. Court Holds That Breach of Undertaking Given to Court Attracts Penalty Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC.

24 Nov 2006

The respondent, Bhikanlal Nanakchand Sharma, owned a shop near Mulund Checknaka, LBS Road, Mulund West, Mumbai. He and other shopkeepers had carried o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Disqualification Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Levy of house tax by Sarpanch on structures within Gram Panchayat limits is a statutory duty and does not constitute misconduct under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

11 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Anita Dhammapal Bodade, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadiadampur, Tahsil Telhara, District Akola. Respondent No.2, Devid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Demarcation of Dharavi Koliwada Boundaries in Dharavi Redevelopment Project Dispute. The court issued a writ of mandamus to the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to expeditiously determine and finalise the outer boundaries of Dharavi Koliwada, finding inordinate delay in the discharge of official duty.

18 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Dharavi Koli Jamat Trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to call fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.

17 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy. The court ruled that revenue authorities cannot decide title disputes and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for such matters.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Mr. Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal and M/s. Rajeshwar Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

25 Nov 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Structures on Municipal Land. Petitioners failed to establish title or tenancy rights over land owned by Municipal Corporation, and structures were unauthorized under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

11 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Rajdev Shivcharan Maurya and another, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

4 Jul 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Demolition of Hutment in Housing Society Compound — Appellant Proves Possession Prior to Cut-off Date Under MMRDA Act. The court held that the appellant's possession since 1975 was protected under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the demolition without notice was illegal.

15 Oct 2016

The appellant, originally the original plaintiff Nirmala Ramswaroop Makkar (since deceased, represented by heirs), filed a suit in the City Civil Cour...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)