Search Results for "unauthorized filing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "unauthorized filing"

962 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 962 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Theft of Documents in Corporate Dispute — Internal Audit Reports and Confidential Documents Not 'Stolen' as They Were Obtained Through Legal Proceedings. The Court held that the ingredients of theft under Section 379 IPC are not satisfied when documents are obtained through legal proceedings and used in bona fide litigation, and continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

15 May 2019

The appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by Birla Corporation Limited (the appellant) against Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited and ot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Tenant Failed to Prove Permission for Construction and Suit Was Barred by Lack of Statutory Notice Under Section 527 of BMC Act.

6 Sep 2013

The appellant, Shivashankar Swami, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court challenging a notice dated 5 July 1999 issued under Section 354A of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee for Unauthorized Absence Despite Medical Reasons — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Labour and Industrial Courts. Employee failed to prove that absence was due to illness or reasonable cause; medical certificates not sufficient to justify prolonged absence of 296 days.

21 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Deepak Bhimraj Kamble, was employed by Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. He was charge-sheeted on three occasions for unauthorized absence: f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Railway Employee Challenging Removal from Service for Unauthorized Travel. Use of Union Pass for Private Travel Constitutes Misconduct and Removal is Proportionate Punishment.

5 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Paikuji Chiwande, a Shunter 'B' employed with Central Railways at Ballarshah, was granted leave from 27th to 28th August 1982 to meet ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal of Bank Employee for Unauthorized Absence Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Disproportionate Punishment. Inquiry officer's failure to consider medical evidence and imposition of dismissal for 146 days absence held to be disproportionate under Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976.

26 Feb 2021

The petitioner, A.K. Siddalingappa, was an officer of Syndicate Bank working as Incharge Manager of the Stationary Pool. He was charged with unauthori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal from Service for Unauthorized Absence — Upholds Disciplinary Authority's Findings. The Court held that the penalty of removal from service for unauthorized absence of 81 days was proportionate and not shockingly disproportionate under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

30 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Madhu S. Sadlapurkar, was employed as a watchman by the Commandant, A.C. Centre and School, Ahmednagar in 1966. In March 1983, he was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction of Disputed Development Control Regulations in PIL Challenging Unauthorized Insertion by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. Unauthorized Insertion of Regulations 16.4.12 and 16.4.13 Without General Body Approval Violates Section 37 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Vitiates State Government's Approval.

9 Sep 2014

The case originated from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur challenging the legality of the insertion of two regulatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization for Construction on Land Reserved for Garden Under MRTP Act.

15 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Mohammed Ibrahim Abdul Khalique, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of a structure on a plo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that IOD does not confer immunity from action for illegal construction beyond sanctioned plans under MRTP Act, 1966.

13 Apr 2005

The appellant, Parvez M. Yusuf, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai under Section 53(1) of the Mah...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)