Search Results for "temporary employee termination"

621 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 621 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages for Termination Without Enquiry. Violation of Sections 25F and 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Found as Employee Was Not Given Notice or Compensation and Principle of Last Come First Go Was Not Followed.

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners (the Principal of Industrial Training Institute, Khamgaon, and the Joint Director of Vocational Educa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Reinstatement of CRPF Constable in Termination Case — Termination Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Rule 5(1) of Central Civil Service (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 Termination Quashed as No Opportunity of Hearing Given and Order Stigmatic.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the appellants (CRPF authorities) against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Back Wages to 10% for Habitually Absent Employee in Termination Dispute with ONGC. Termination under Regulation 24 of 1975 Regulations held illegal due to long service, but back wages reduced to 10% considering habitual absence and delay in approaching Labour Court.

The case involves a dispute between Anjana Mittal (appellant) and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (respondent) regarding the termination of he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Absorption of Temporary Employee in University of Mumbai. Employer's Practice of Engaging Temporary Employees for Years Without Regularisation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The University of Mumbai (Petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th December 1999, which allowed a complaint filed by Shri S....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Lecturer in Service Dispute — Stigmatic Termination Quashed. Termination order stating 'work and behaviour not satisfactory' is stigmatic and requires disciplinary inquiry under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Mr. Rohidas Ganpat Godse, was appointed as a lecturer in Accountancy at G.B. Khare College after being selected by a duly constituted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Probationer Stenographer for Unsatisfactory Work. Termination of a probationer on grounds of unsuitability is not stigmatic and does not require a formal inquiry.

The petitioner, Pankaj Suresh Bhadane, was appointed as a Stenographer (Lower Grade) with the Labour Court at Thane on 10th September 2012 on probatio...