WRIT PETITION NO. 15903 OF 2024
6 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "telecommunication towers"
46 result(s) found
Found 46 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Assessee's payments for call center services and software maintenance held not liable for TDS under Section 194J of Income Tax Act, 1961 as they do not constitute 'technical services'.
28 Jul 2016The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the common order of the Inco...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Assessee's payments for call center services and software maintenance not subject to TDS under Section 194J of Income Tax Act, 1961 as they do not constitute 'technical services'.
28 Jul 2016The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the order of the Income Tax ...
- 102
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. TDS provisions under Section 194H of Income Tax Act, 1961 not applicable to payments made by Vodafone to its distributors as the relationship was not that of principal-agent but principal-to-principal.
28 Jul 2016The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) and the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against M/s. Vodafone South Lt...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Vodafone TDS Case — No Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) for Non-Deduction of TDS on Payments to Non-Residents Without Permanent Establishment in India. The court held that where the non-resident has no permanent establishment in India, the income is not taxable in India, and consequently, no TDS is required under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
28 Jul 2016The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the common order of the Inco...
- 76
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.
1 Jan 1970The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...
- 61
High Court
downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit for Recovery of Rent — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed by Trial Court Set Aside. Plaint Rejected for Lack of Cause of Action as Lease Agreement Not Signed by Defendant.
18 Nov 2015The petitioner, Indus Towers Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of th...
- 74
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies NGT Order on Water Use from Forest Land Diversion for Drinking Water Purposes. The court held that water drawn from forest land diverted for drinking water cannot be used for industrial purposes without specific clearance, and directed the District Collector to monitor surplus water allocation pending MoEF&CC decision.
11 Feb 2019The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from an order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 28 November 2018. The dispu...
- 204
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.
3 Oct 2024The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...
- 1360
