Search Results for "subsequent proposal"

2265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Interim Relief to Advertisement Agency in Arbitration Dispute Over Hoarding Construction Agreement. The court found a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Adtrack Media LLP, an advertisement agency, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs Coastal Zone Authority to Decide on Mangrove Cutting for High-Speed Rail Project. Court Holds That Expert Bodies Must First Determine Larger Public Interest Before Permitting Destruction of Mangroves Under Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011.

The writ petition arose from a decision of the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) deferring permission for the National High Speed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LOI and Final Approval for New Colleges — Petitioner Lacks Locus Due to De-affiliation. The court held that a de-affiliated institution cannot challenge permissions granted to other colleges under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016.

The petitioner, Nisargdeep Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a registered public trust, had been running Shri Tuljabhavani Arts and Science College at Chitte-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Hostel Transfer Proposal Under Changed Policy. Government Resolution dated 31.10.2014 supersedes earlier policy; no vested right to have proposal considered under old policy.

The petitioner, a registered society running a boys' hostel for backward class students, applied on 18.09.2010 for transfer of a permanently closed bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...