Search Results for "striking out party"

357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners — Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC. Discretionary Power Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Be Exercised Mechanically Without Showing Prejudice.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Shashikant Yeshwant Pal and Tanaji Yeshwant Pal, and their respective wives, over a house p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Maintenance in Family Court Proceedings. Failure to Pay Interim Maintenance Under Section 18 of Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956 Justifies Striking Off Defence Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The petitioner-husband and respondent-wife married on 3.5.1983. Marital discord led to multiple proceedings: the wife filed for divorce under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Failure to Furnish Material Facts and Full Particulars of Alleged Corrupt Practices Renders Petition Liable for Summary Dismissal.

The petitioner, Dr. Kirit Jayantilal Somaiya, filed an election petition challenging the election of respondent No.1, Sanjay Dina Patil, from the Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...