Search Results for "splitting complaint"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Engineers in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Intent to Humiliate. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Meeting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Prashant Patil and Mohan Gavit, were Assistant Junior Engineer and Sectional Engineer respectively at Panchayat Samiti, Sakri. Respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Special Court at Bombay Delivers Judgment in Securities Fraud Case — Accused Face Charges Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for Cheating, Forgery, and Criminal Conspiracy

This criminal case arises from the 1992 securities scam, which severely impacted India's economy. The prosecution alleged that multiple accused person...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120-B, 203 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence.

The appellant, Dinesh Thakare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Chandrapur, for the murder of his wife Harsha under Sections 302, 201, 120-B and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee — Enquiry Findings Held Perverse Due to Lack of Evidence. Labour Court's Order of Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages Upheld as No Perversity Found.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment of the Labour Court, Jalgaon, which had set aside the di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 145 CrPC Proceedings in Multi-Party Disputes and Successive Orders. The court held that Section 145 CrPC applies to disputes involving more than two parties and that successive orders are permissible if fresh material shows a new apprehension of breach of peace.

The case involves a group of writ petitions and intervention applications challenging the validity of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Cri...