Search Results for "settlement enforcement"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 50(1)(b) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Not Binding on Non-Signatory Respondents as They Were Not Parties to Arbitration Agreement.

The appellant, Integrated Sales Services Limited (ISSL), a Hong Kong company, entered into a Representation Agreement on 18th September 2000 with DMC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Labour Court's Finding on Majority Union. Membership Verification by Labour Court is Final and Binding on Employer and Rival Union.

The case involves a dispute between two trade unions, Akhil Dadra & Nagar Haveli Kamgar Sangh (appellant in LPA 197/2008) and Krantikari Kamgar Union ...