High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "section 33(4)"
520 result(s) found
Found 520 result(s)
High Court
- 36
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Elected Municipal Councilors' Writ Petitions Against Additional Collector's Jurisdiction in Disqualification Proceedings. Court Holds Additional Collector's Jurisdiction Valid Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and Finds No Bias in Conduct of Proceedings.
4 Apr 2014Three elected municipal councilors of Municipal Council, Gondia, filed writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents challengi...
- 104
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Whether Registrar NCLT Can Scrutinize Maintainability of Section 95 IBC Petition at Filing Stage. Appeal Challenges Single Judge's Order Holding E-Filing of Insolvency Petition Against Partnership Firm Void and Non-Est.
16 Oct 2024The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Manyata Reallty, a partnership firm, challenging the e-filing of a petition under Section 95 of the...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.
3 Mar 2017The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Assets Received from AE Not Taxable Under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act. The court held that assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are not taxable as perquisite under Section 28(iv) as they are not in the nature of 'benefit' arising from business or profession.
28 Jul 2025The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 again...
- 33
High Court
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure.
26 Feb 2024The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,...
- 21
High Court
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order to Issue Relieving Letter to Employee Who Breached Bond. Employee's Right to Service Certificate Held Not Conditional on Completion of Bond Period Under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
5 May 2026The Bombay High Court dealt with a writ petition filed by Bharat Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and its director challenging an interlocutory order of the Industr...
- 220
