High Court Examines Challenge to Reservation Notifications for Urban Local Body Wards in Karnataka. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Impugned Notifications and Reversion to Draft Reservations.
14 Jan 2019...
Search Results for "reserved area"
4533 result(s) found
Found 4533 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.
16 Aug 2018The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as per report dated 11.01.2008 instead of Rs. 1 lakh per hectare under Government Resolution dated 06.03.2009.
5 May 2016The petitioner, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in power generation, challenged the demand for Irrigatio...
- 24
High Court
High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.
24 Apr 2006The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation for Primary School Under Section 127 MRTP Act Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. The Court held that failure of Nagpur Municipal Corporation to acquire reserved land within ten years results in automatic lapsing of reservation, entitling landowner to declaration and notification under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act.
9 Dec 2022The petitioner, Urban Township Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned two parcels of land admeasuring 4907 sq.mtrs. an...
- 89
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
10 Jul 2024The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...
- 429
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Land Owner's Right to Insist on Acquisition under Section 126 MRTP Act After Town Planning Scheme Reservation. The Court frames the legal issue regarding the interrelationship between Chapters V and VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 in the context of land reserved for public purposes.
1 Aug 2026The appeal arose from a dispute regarding a plot of land reserved for Municipal Office in a Town Planning Scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and To...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.
11 Dec 2006This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO's Land Allotment to Private Developer in Navi Mumbai Under MRTP Act. Alleged Violations Include Absence of Open Tender, Lack of Government Approval for FSI Enhancement, and Unauthorized Land Use Conversion in Sector 30A Vashi, Under Sections 113, 154 and New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations, 1975.
21 Nov 2014The case pertains to two public interest litigations filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...
- 47
