Search Results for "reopening assessment"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act for A.Y. 2012-13 Based on Search Action — Held That Section 153C Overrides Section 147 for Search-Related Assessments

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in HDFC Bank Bad Debts Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Section 148 notice under Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reassessment based on change of opinion and lack of tangible material.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., a scheduled bank registered with RBI, filed its return of income for assessment year 2006-07 and claimed deductions un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening and Agricultural Income Estimation Case. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid for lack of tangible material, and Tribunal's reversal of CIT(A)'s agricultural income estimation set aside as perverse.

The appellant, Shri S L Basavaraj (HUF), an assessee, filed appeals against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09 Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts and Change of Opinion. Remuneration Paid to Directors Was Fully Disclosed and Examined During Original Assessment, So Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. OHM Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, challenged notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reope...