Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Legal Heir in Redevelopment Scheme — All Legal Heirs Jointly Entitled to Permanent Alternative Accommodation Under Regulation 33(7) of DCR 1991, Non-Occupation Does Not Disentitle.

The petitioner, Aliasgar Razaali Zaboli, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Chief Officer, Mumbai Building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme — Alternate Flats Already Allotted on Ownership Basis. Petitioners' Challenge to Eviction Fails as Larger Alternate Accommodation Was Provided Under the Slum Redevelopment Scheme.

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging their eviction from slum premises as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Nagpur Improvement Trust Challenging High Court Order Setting Aside Demolition Notice. Internal Road Not Shown in Development Plan Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Implemented Despite Earlier Scheme Under NIT Act.

The case involves a dispute over a 15-metre internal road proposed under a Town Planning Scheme (the 'Abhyankar Road Widening and Buty Mahal Street Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Sanction Procedure Under D.C. Regulations. Court Considers Whether First Come First Serve Principle Applies to Competing Applications for Slum Redevelopment Under Regulation 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for the City of Mumbai, 1991.

The petitioners, a proposed co-operative housing society of hutment dwellers residing on a plot of land measuring about 15,600 sq. mtrs. in Malad, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Judgment Upholding Sanction of Competing Slum Scheme; Appeal Ongoing.

The dispute centered on a 2,005 sq. mts. parcel in Malad, Mumbai, originally declared a slum in 1987 under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Objection Certificate for Society Redevelopment. Circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 held not mandatory but directory.

The Petitioner, a member of Navbharatiya Bhavan (1) Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd., challenged the order dated 1st November 2014 granting a No Objection Certif...