Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Objection Certificate for Society Redevelopment. Circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 held not mandatory but directory.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 59
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, a member of Navbharatiya Bhavan (1) Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd., challenged the order dated 1st November 2014 granting a No Objection Certificate for re-development of the society's building and sought a declaration that the Development Agreement dated 28th October 2014 between the society and the developer was null and void for violating a circular dated 3rd January 2009 issued under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society had passed resolutions in 2006 and 2008 to redevelop, and after receiving bids, entered into an agreement with Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd. The Petitioner argued that the circular required certain procedures before entering into a development agreement, which were not followed. The Court examined the circular and found that it was directory, not mandatory, as it did not use the word 'shall' and was intended to guide societies. The Court held that non-compliance did not render the agreement void. The Court also noted that the Petitioner had participated in the meetings and did not object earlier. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Societies - Redevelopment - Circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Whether mandatory - The Court held that the circular is directory and not mandatory, and therefore the Development Agreement entered into without compliance with the circular is not void. The Court reasoned that the circular does not use the word 'shall' and is intended to guide societies, not to invalidate agreements. (Paras 1-18)

B) Co-operative Societies - No Objection Certificate - Validity - The Court upheld the No Objection Certificate granted by Respondent No.1 for re-development, finding no violation of any mandatory provision. (Paras 1-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the circular dated 3rd January 2009 issued under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is mandatory and whether the Development Agreement dated 28th October 2014 is null and void for non-compliance with the said circular.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court dismissed the Writ Petition with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960 is directory and not mandatory
  • Development Agreement not void for non-compliance with circular
  • No Objection Certificate validly granted
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 146

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.126 OF 2015

2015-07-01

V.M. KANADE, B.P. COLABAWALLA

Mr Owen Menezes i/b Mr Johnson John for Petitioner, Mr Milind More, AGP for Respondent No.1, Mr S.S. Kumbhar for Respondent No.2, Mr Ashish Kamat i/b Mr V.N. Tendulkar for Respondent No.3

Dr Ranajit S. Mukherjee

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging order granting No Objection Certificate for re-development and seeking declaration that Development Agreement is null and void.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 1st November 2014 granting No Objection Certificate and declaration that Development Agreement dated 28th October 2014 is null and void.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the Development Agreement violated circular dated 3rd January 2009 issued under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Issues

Whether the circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is mandatory? Whether the Development Agreement dated 28th October 2014 is null and void for non-compliance with the said circular?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the circular is mandatory and its non-compliance renders the Development Agreement void. Respondents argued that the circular is directory and not mandatory, and the Development Agreement is valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The circular dated 3rd January 2009 issued under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is directory and not mandatory. Non-compliance with the circular does not render a development agreement void.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner is a member of a housing co-operative society known as the 'Navbharatiya Bhavan (1) Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd.' By this Petition, challenge has been laid to the order dated 1st November, 2014 passed by Respondent No.1 granting a No Objection for re-development of the building.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the order dated 1st November 2014 granting No Objection Certificate and seeking declaration that Development Agreement dated 28th October 2014 is null and void. The petition was reserved on 17th June 2015 and pronounced on 1st July 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 79A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Full Disclosure of Waiver of Interest in Original Assessment Precludes Reassessment After Four Years.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as demand of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.