Search Results for "rectification order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "rectification order"

901 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 901 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Order Rectifying Mutation Entry in Land Dispute — Holds Revenue Authority Cannot Adjudicate Title in Summary Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The impugned order was set aside for lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice, and the Tahsildar was directed to restore the mutation entry as it stood prior to the order.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Namdev Mahadu Jambhulkar and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10th December 2021 passed by the Tahsildar, Mul...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order Dismissing ROM Application as Time-Barred. Time Limit Under Section 129B(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Applies Only to Suo Moto Rectification, Not to Applications Filed by Parties.

10 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Allied Fibers Ltd., imported capital goods between October 1994 and September 1995. A show cause notice was issued on 24.03.1998 d...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Order Passed Under Section 271D of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Penalty Was Imposed for Alleged Violation of Section 269SS Regarding Cash Loans.

25 Feb 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Rectification Application Under KVAT Act — Time Limit for Rectification Under Section 69(1) Is Five Years from Date of Order. The court upheld the Revisional Authority's order rejecting the rectification application as time-barred under Section 69(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

17 Aug 2016

The appellant, M/s. Manasa Electricals Co., filed returns for the assessment year 2005-2006 under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act). ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Gift Deed Rectification Case — Donor's Intention Not Established. Plaintiff Failed to Prove That Gift Deed Did Not Reflect True Intention of Donor, and Defendants' Title Through Registered Will Upheld.

11 Aug 2016

The case involves a dispute over 4 acres of land in Survey No. 100/2. The plaintiff, Gokarnabai, claimed ownership based on a registered gift deed dat...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Transfer of Rectification Petitions; Holds Jurisdiction for Rectification Lies with High Court of Appropriate Office. The Court interpreted the definite article 'the' in Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 to mean the High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction over the relevant Trade Marks Registry, and held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to transfer rectification petitions when the court lacks statutory jurisdiction.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a private company, filed C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.199 of 2023 before the Madras High Court against several parties including the 5th respond...

Supreme Court

Permanent Injunction Denied Due to Failure to Prove Title & Property Identity: Supreme Court Restores Trial Court Judgment (2025 INSC 1450)

17 Dec 2025

The Supreme Court held that a suit for permanent injunction cannot succeed unless the plaintiff establishes both clear title and proper identification...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Revenue Orders and Patta Issuance. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Orders Passed by Revenue Officials Under Article 226 of Constitution.

19 Mar 2025

The matter involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The fir...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)