Search Results for "re-development agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "re-development agreement"

510 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Clause (9) of Regulation 33(5) of DCR, 1991 in Redevelopment FSI Dispute. Cooperative Society Disputes Denial of Higher FSI Under 2017 Notification on Ground of Arbitrary Classification Based on Date of NOC Issuance, Alleging Violation of Articles 14 and 300A.

12 Sep 2018

The writ petition was filed by Pantanagar Gokul C.H.S. Ltd., a cooperative housing society, seeking to avail the benefit of increased Floor Space Inde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

16 Oct 2025

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Legal Heir in Redevelopment Scheme — All Legal Heirs Jointly Entitled to Permanent Alternative Accommodation Under Regulation 33(7) of DCR 1991, Non-Occupation Does Not Disentitle.

22 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Aliasgar Razaali Zaboli, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Chief Officer, Mumbai Building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Termination of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Appointment — Upholds SRA's Power to Terminate Developer for Delay and Loss of Faith of Slum Dwellers. The court held that the CEO, SRA, validly exercised power under Section 32 of the Maharashtra Slums Act, 1971, and the termination was justified as the delay was attributable to the developer and the majority of slum dwellers had lost faith.

10 May 2024

The petitioner, a developer, challenged the termination of his appointment to implement a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SR Scheme) on a property owned b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Against Non-Cooperative Members. Court Rules Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board Has Jurisdiction to Invoke Section 95A Under DCR 33(5) for Redevelopment of MHADA Layouts.

4 Feb 2010

The writ petition challenged an order of summary eviction under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, directed agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of C-1 Building Despite IBC Moratorium — Development Rights Not Asset of Corporate Debtor. Cooperative Housing Society's Right to Redevelop Its Property Upheld Against Resolution Professional's Interference.

11 Sep 2024

The Petitioner, Kher Nagar Sukhsadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned a building on land leased from MHADA. In 2005, it entered into a Develop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.

15 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Co-operative Housing Society from Appointing Another Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Letters exchanged between developer and society held to constitute a binding contract for redevelopment, and termination letter declared illegal.

1 Feb 2024

The plaintiff, Pittie Antariksh Grl Pvt Ltd, a real estate company, filed a suit seeking declaration that letters dated 30/8/2021 and 23/10/2021 const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Arbitration Application in Redevelopment Dispute — Tender Clause Not an Arbitration Agreement. Clause in Tender for redevelopment of Tenants Co-Operative Housing Society providing for settlement of disputes held not to be an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Mar 2023

The applicant, Omkar Realtors & Developer Private Limited, filed a Commercial Arbitration Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Judgment on Admission in Favor of Plaintiff in Redevelopment Dispute — Developer Admits Entitlement to Alternate Flat. Court holds that admission of claim for specific performance entitles plaintiff to judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, and additional FSI benefits under DC Rules 1991 are to be shared equally as per agreement.

15 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, a member of defendant No.2 society, filed a suit against defendant No.1 developer and defendant No.2 society seeking entitlement to fla...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)