Search Results for "promotion bar"

Trending :

Search Results for "promotion bar"

659 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 659 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion of Employee Despite Pending Disciplinary and Criminal Proceedings - Seeks Reconsideration of Eligibility for Supervisory Clerk Post. The Court directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's case for promotion by adopting the sealed cover procedure, as mere pendency of proceedings does not disentitle an employee from consideration.

5 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Ashok Madhukar Nand, was employed as a Senior Clerk with the Maharashtra State Secondary and Higher Secondary Board. He was denied pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sealed Cover Procedure in Promotion — Petitioner Entitled to Promotion with Notional Benefits from Date of Junior's Promotion. Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When Disciplinary Proceedings Are Initiated After DPC Meeting; Employee Exonerated Entitled to Promotion from Date Junior Promoted.

5 Jul 2023

The petitioner, an employee of United India Insurance Company Limited, was considered for promotion by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) in 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Corrigendum Modifying Promotion Date for Assistant Professors under Career Advancement Scheme. The Court held that the date of promotion from Assistant Professor to Associate Professor must be the date of eligibility, not the date of selection, as per the original Government Resolution.

5 May 2022

The petitioner, Dr. Sharmila Sandesh Ghuge, an Assistant Professor, challenged a Corrigendum dated 10/05/2019 issued by the Higher and Technical Educa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cantonment Board Promotion Dispute, Reinstating Appellant's Promotion Based on Seniority from Higher Pay Scale. Promotion to Office Superintendent Under Cantonment Fund Servant Rules, 1937 Upheld as Appellant's Seniority in Feeder Cadre Determined by Higher Pay Scale, Not Date of Appointment.

2 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a promotion conflict within the Cantonment Board, Ranikhet, involving the appellant and the respondent, both employees vying fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.

8 Apr 2020

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging University Regulations on Migration from 3-Year LL.B to 5-Year Integrated Law Course. The court held that the Bar Council of India Rules of Legal Education, 2008 do not permit migration from a 3-year LL.B course to a 5-year integrated law course, and the university regulations were valid.

27 Aug 2018

The petitioners, two students who had completed a 3-year LL.B degree course, sought to migrate to the 4th year of a 5-year integrated B.A., LL.B cours...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petitions Challenging CAT Directions on Promotion to General Manager (Open Line) — Employer's Delay and Contradictory Stand Negate Requirement of DRM Experience. Court Holds That Under Indian Railway Establishment Rules, 1986, Working as Divisional Railway Manager Is Not a Mandatory Eligibility Condition, and Employer Cannot Set Up Its Own Wrong to Deny Consideration for Promotion.

4 Sep 2017

The dispute arose from the denial of promotion to the post of General Manager (Open Line) to an officer of the Indian Railways. The officer had faced ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Policy and Seniority Rules. The court held that promotions must follow the prescribed reservation policy and consider seniority, and directed reconsideration of promotions.

20 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Narendra Barde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the promotion of Respondent Nos. 2 an...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)