Search Results for "possession delay"

3686 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3686 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiffs in Property Declaration Suit Due to Omission of Possession Relief. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Held Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Plaintiff, Not in Possession, Failed to Seek Further Relief of Possession.

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 1987 by Arakeri Abbaiah, the original plaintiff, seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Execution Proceedings for Decree Holder. Delay of 13 Years in Filing Execution Application Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing Due to Pendency of Appeal and Other Proceedings.

The petitioner, M/s. Botanium Limited (now merged in Go Airlines (India) Limited), was the decree holder in Regular Civil Suit No. 292 of 1983. The su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to Gross Delay and Laches. Petitioner's failure to establish tenancy and inordinate delay in challenging notifications under Land Acquisition Act bars relief.

The petitioner, Vinayak Bhaskar Sinai Dhume, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging notifications dated 7th April 1999 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting delay condonation application by applying strict limitation principles instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed Regular Civil Suit No.155 of 2007 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Central Excise Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. Prosecution for Alleged Removal of Scrap Resistors Without Payment of Duty Fails as Complaint Filed After 4 Years and Sanction Under Section 9 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Obtained.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Criminal Case No....