Search Results for "possession and rent arrears"

766 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 766 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit Over Rent Default — Notice of Demand Not Proved. Education Cess Not Payable Monthly Under Maharashtra Education (Cess) Act, 1962, Hence Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Rates (Control) Act, 1947 Not Attracted.

The case involves a landlord's suit for eviction of tenants from two rooms in Mumbai on the ground of default in payment of rent. The landlord issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Civil Revision on Willful Default in Rent under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Tenant Challenges Concurrent Eviction Orders, Arguing Joint Family Tenancy and Non-Willful Default.

The matter arose from a civil revision application filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging concurrent decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Defendant Not Liable for Rent After Vacating Premises. Tenant's Liability for Rent Ceases Upon Vacating and Handing Over Possession, Even Without Formal Termination Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendant, M. Bhaskar, against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2015 passed by the VII Additi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree — Valid Service of Demand Notice and Application of Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act Upheld. Tenant's refusal of notice and monthly tenancy established; Appellate Court's findings not perverse.

The petitioners, Gorakh Rambhau Chothve and Jalinder Rambhau Chothve, were defendants in a suit for eviction and arrears of rent filed by the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Eviction Orders for Non-Payment of Rent. Tenant Failed to Deposit Arrears Despite Statutory Protection Under Section 12(3)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, a tenant of two shop blocks since 1977-1978, was sued for eviction by the respondent landlords for non-payment of rent from 01-08-1997...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Maharashtra Rent Act, 1999 — Notice Under Section 15 Held Valid Despite Inclusion of Time-Barred Rent Claim, but Eviction on Bonafide Need Set Aside as Landlord Gave Up That Ground.

The petitioner, a tenant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 27/4/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Default in Rent Payment and Landlord's Bonafide Need. Standard Rent Fixation Upheld Despite Tenant's Challenge Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Anantrao Bahirat, was a tenant in premises owned by the respondent, Rohidas Bapusaheb Tupe. The respondent landlord filed ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Rent Control Dispute Over Subletting and Bona Fide Requirement. Landlord Failed to Prove Illegal Subletting and Bona Fide Need for Suit Property Under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioner, Milind Rajkumar Wagholikar (Shah), was the landlord of a suit property bearing CTS No. 506/34, new CTS No. 866, admeasuring about 7500...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...