Search Results for "petroleum refinery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "petroleum refinery"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition by State-Owned Oil Corporation to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Petitioner Alleges That Award Is Vitiated by Fraud Due to Non-Disclosure of Corporate Insolvency Proceedings by Respondent Joint Venture.

19 Jan 2026

The matter arose out of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitrator Appointment in BPCL Dispute — No Bias Found in Sole Arbitrator Being an Employee of the Respondent Company. The court held that mere employment does not create automatic disqualification under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and petitioners failed to show actual bias.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns five arbitration petitions filed by different companies (Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Wires Limited Ltd., Universa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Section 11D Demand for Ethanol Blended Petrol. The court held that CESTAT erred in setting aside demand under Section 11D of Central Excise Act, 1944 merely because duty was not separately shown in invoice, as duty was collected as part of composite price.

18 Jul 2023

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate appealed against an order of CESTAT, Mumbai dated 31 August 2020, which allowed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute Over Withheld Payments. Court upholds award directing release of Rs. 2,66,48,000 with 8% interest, finding no patent illegality or perversity under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 2 March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

1 Feb 2023

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Petroleum Dealers Challenging VAT Assessment Orders. Assessment orders under Dadra and Nagar Haveli Value Added Tax Act, 2005 set aside as barred by limitation and violative of natural justice.

21 May 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several petroleum dealers (M/s. Yogi Petroleum, Jay Jalaram Construction Co., M/s. Ratan P...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Seizure of Industrial Oil by DRI Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — DRI Has Power to Seize Goods Even After Clearance for Home Consumption. The court held that the power of seizure under Section 110 is independent of assessment and can be exercised by DRI officers as proper officers.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by importers of industrial oil challenging the seizure of their goods by the Directorate of Reve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disinvestment of BPCL and Repeal of Burmah Shell Act — Strategic Disinvestment Policy Not Subject to Legislative Mandate for Prior Parliamentary Approval. The court held that the executive is competent to decide disinvestment under Article 73, and the repeal of the Burmah Shell Act by Finance Act 2016 is valid, with no right of first refusal for employees or dealers.

12 Nov 2020

The judgment concerns four petitions challenging the Union of India's decision to disinvest its shareholding in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Service Tax Reimbursement Denied for Non-Submission of Cenvatable Documents. Contractual Condition Requiring Submission of Cenvatable Documents for Service Tax Reimbursement Upheld as Valid and Enforceable.

2 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Workman Dismissed Without Domestic Inquiry. Employer's Challenge Dismissed as Tribunal Correctly Found Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Nov 2023

The judgment arises from two cross writ petitions: one by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL) challenging an Industrial Tribunal award dated 30 A...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)