Bombay High Court Adjudicates a Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Against National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. and Others. Petitions Relate to Claims Arising from Alleged Default of a Trading Member and the Role of Regulatory Bodies.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "persons having interest"
8816 result(s) found
Found 8816 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.
1 Aug 2026The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...
- 13
High Court
KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.
11 Aug 2014The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...
- 37
High Court
- 55
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges by Landowners in KIADB Proceedings — Preliminary Notification Under Section 28(1) of KIAD Act Not Quashed Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Section 28(2) and Section 28(4). The court held that the petitioners were guilty of delay and laches and had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition after the final notification was issued.
12 Nov 2013The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Award on Existence of JEA. The petition challenges an arbitral tribunal's finding that an initialled but unsigned JEA was a valid contract containing an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act.
3 Nov 2025The petition arose out of a partial arbitral award dated January 9, 2014, passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which...
High Court
- 50
High Court
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
- 18
