Appeal Under M.C.O.C. Act: Challenging Charges and Syndicate Involvement
11 Jun 2024Appeal under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (M.C.O.C. Act), challenging the application of its provisions to two appellants accu...
Search Results for "pecuniary advantage"
195 result(s) found
Found 195 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of FIR in Corruption Case Due to Incorrect Legal Test. Investigation Must Proceed as FIR Discloses Cognizable Offence Based on Suspicion Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.
1 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a complaint lodged by Uchit Sharma against Aman Singh, a former Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh, and ...
- 192
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Ex Gratia Payment Not Deductible. High Court's award of Rs. 48,00,000 with 7.5% interest held just; no interference required.
23 Apr 2019The case arises from a vehicular accident on 30.12.1995 where Shri Rajpal Singh Johal died after an oil tanker rammed into his car. Two claim petition...
- 313
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Investigation Order Against Chief Secretary in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act. Court held that no court can take cognizance of an offence under the Act without prior sanction for prosecution of a public servant, and the order under Section 156(3) CrPC directing investigation was invalid as it effectively bypassed the mandatory sanction requirement.
22 Apr 2019The applicant, UPS Madan, who was the Additional Chief Secretary (Finance) and later Chief Secretary of Maharashtra, filed an application under Sectio...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case: Demand Without Acceptance Does Not Constitute Offence Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that for offences under Sections 7, 8, and 13(2) of the PC Act, both demand and acceptance are essential; mere demand without acceptance is not an offence.
13 Mar 2018The applicants, Rajendra Shinde and Sanjay Bramhankar, were public servants working as Chief Manager (Engineering) and Manager (Engineering) respectiv...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Corruption Case Due to Bar on Multiple FIRs for Same Offence. The court held that a second FIR for the same offence is an abuse of process and liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
29 Jun 2015The applicant, Bhaskar Pandurang Walimbe, a government officer on deputation as Additional Tribal Commissioner, Amravati, was implicated in a corrupti...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Valuation Based on Market Value Determines Forum. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Non-Agricultural Property Must Be Valued Under Section 6 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; Plaintiffs Directed to Pay Deficit Court Fees.
13 Apr 2015The case involves a challenge to an order dated 28 October 2014 passed by the 16th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune, which held that the court...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.
5 Nov 2014The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.
8 May 2012The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Police Officer in MCOCA Case for Lack of Sanction and Prima Facie Evidence of Organised Crime. The court held that the absence of valid sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOCA and failure to establish a prima facie case of organised crime entitled the applicant to bail.
25 Jan 2006The applicant, Anil Murlidhar Deshmukh, a police officer, was arrested on 8th October 2004 in connection with a case registered under various sections...
- 75
