Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against MCOCA Charges for Members of Organised Crime Syndicate. Requirement of Two Prior Chargesheets Applies to Syndicate, Not Individual Members.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 399
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, original accused Nos. 2 and 4, filed an appeal under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) challenging an order dated 29th December 2022 passed by the Special Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, which rejected their application to drop MCOCA charges and transfer the case to a regular court. The case arose from an incident on 18th December 2020 where the informant and his family were assaulted by a group led by Shravan @ Aawan J. Chavan, the head of an organised crime syndicate, over a construction contract. The appellants were alleged to have actively participated in the assault. The prosecution obtained prior approval under Section 23(1)(a) and sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOCA. The appellants argued that MCOCA was wrongly applied because they were not accused in any other crimes and there was no pecuniary gain for them. The court, after hearing arguments and reviewing the record, including CCTV footage and witness statements, found that the appellants were present and actively involved in the crime as members of the syndicate. The court held that the requirement of two prior chargesheets in the preceding 10 years pertains to the organised crime syndicate, not each individual member. The appeal was dismissed, and the trial court's order was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3, 11, 12, 23 - Application of MCOCA to Members of Organised Crime Syndicate - The appellants sought dropping of MCOCA charges on the ground that they were not individually accused in two prior crimes. The Court held that the requirement of two chargesheets in the preceding 10 years of which cognizance is taken is qua the organised crime syndicate and not against each member. The presence and active participation of the appellants in the crime, along with the syndicate head, justified the application of MCOCA. (Paras 9-10)

B) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Case - Section 11 of MCOCA - The appellants sought transfer of the case to a regular court after dropping MCOCA charges. Since the Court upheld the MCOCA charges, the question of transfer did not arise. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) can be applied to the appellants who are not individually accused in two prior crimes, and whether the trial court erred in rejecting their application to drop MCOCA charges.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The trial court's order rejecting the application to drop MCOCA charges is upheld.

Law Points

  • MCOCA
  • Section 3
  • organised crime syndicate
  • prior approval
  • sanction
  • two chargesheets requirement
  • member liability
  • dropping of charges
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 118

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 433 OF 2023

2023-04-12

A. S. Gadkari

Mr. Sejpal for Appellants, Ms. Takalkar for Respondent-State

Nilesh @ Nilesh Suresh Yadav and Anil @ Anil Suresh Yadav

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 12 of MCOCA against order rejecting application to drop MCOCA charges and transfer case.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought dropping of MCOCA charges and transfer of case to regular court.

Filing Reason

Appellants contended MCOCA was wrongly applied as they were not individually accused in two prior crimes and had no pecuniary gain.

Previous Decisions

Trial court rejected application to drop MCOCA charges on 29th December 2022.

Issues

Whether the requirement of two prior chargesheets under MCOCA applies to each individual member or to the organised crime syndicate. Whether there was sufficient material to apply MCOCA to the appellants.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued no active participation, no TIP, no pecuniary gain, and no two prior crimes against them individually. State argued sufficient material including CCTV footage and witness statements showing active involvement and syndicate activity for pecuniary gain.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement of two chargesheets in the preceding 10 years under MCOCA pertains to the organised crime syndicate, not each individual member. The presence and active participation of the appellants in the crime as members of the syndicate justifies the application of MCOCA.

Judgment Excerpts

It is not the mandate of law that, against each of the member of an Organised Crime Syndicate, two crimes must be registered for invoking and for applying the provisions of M.C.O.C. Act. The necessity of lodgment of two crimes in preceding 10 years of which cognizance is taken is qua the Organised Crime Syndicate and not against each and every member of it.

Procedural History

The appellants filed an application (Exh.6) before the Special Judge to drop MCOCA charges and transfer the case. The application was rejected on 29th December 2022. The appellants then filed the present appeal under Section 12 of MCOCA before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999: 3, 11, 12, 23
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307, 451, 452, 380, 324, 323, 504, 427, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 506
  • Maharashtra Police Act: 37(A), (1), 135
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 164
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Directs Tribunal to Expedite Interim Order in Transfer Dispute - Service Matter. Petitioner sought stay of transfer order; Tribunal deferred interim prayer; High Court directed Tribunal to consider interim application within two weeks.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Dismisses Appeals by Workman Challenging Termination Orders in Complaints of Unfair Labour Practice; Non-Compliance of Industrial Disputes Act Provisions Not Found to Vitiate Termination of Daily-Wage Employee