Search Results for "pay stagnation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "pay stagnation"

88 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Addresses Reference on Withdrawal of ACPS Benefits for Non-Qualification in Departmental Test. Court Examines Whether Failing to Achieve Benchmark Marks in Promotion Examination Constitutes Ineligibility or Disqualification Justifying Withdrawal under 2001 and 2010 Government Resolutions.

12 Apr 2024

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was tasked with answering a reference framed by a Division Bench regarding the circumstances under which benef...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.

17 Sep 2019

The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

28 Apr 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Government's Implementation of Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme from 2008 in Service Law Dispute. The Court held that MACPS is an incentive scheme distinct from earlier pay structures, and the government's policy decision to implement it from 01.09.2008 rather than 01.01.2006 is justified and not arbitrary.

28 Apr 2021

The dispute centered on the effective date for implementation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for civilian employees of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

21 Feb 2011

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Periodical Promotion Scheme Benefits from 1994 for Non-Teaching Employees. Discrimination in Implementation of G.R. dated 12th July 2004 Quashed as Arbitrary.

11 Jul 2017

The Petitioners, nine Class 'C' and 'D' non-teaching employees of various educational institutions in Sangli and Satara districts, filed a writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Dispute Over Application Date. The Court set aside the Delhi High Court's direction to apply the MACP scheme from 01-01-2006, holding that the scheme's effective date of 01-09-2008 under the office memorandum dated 19-05-2009 was valid, and employees not completing 24 years of service by that date were not entitled to benefits under the superseded ACP scheme.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the applicability date of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) introduced b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Promotion Policy Differentiating Pay Scales Between Direct Recruits and Promotees in Maharashtra Water Resources Department. The court held that the policy is not arbitrary and does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, as the classification is based on intelligible differentia and rational nexus.

7 Feb 2019

The petitioners, an association of subordinate service engineers and individual engineers working as Deputy Engineers and Sectional Engineers in the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Drivers' Petition for Time Bound Promotion Scheme Benefits. Government Resolution dated 17.5.2003 Quashed as Discriminatory Against Drivers in Zilla Parishads.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioners, four drivers employed by Zilla Parishads in Gadchiroli, Amravati, and Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Personal Secretaries for Pay Refixation by Merging Special Pay into Basic Pay. The court held that special pay granted for higher responsibilities must be merged upon promotion to a higher post, quashing the state's order denying the benefit.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioners, an association of Personal Assistants, Private Secretaries, and Senior Private Secretaries of the Bombay High Court, along with an in...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)