Search Results for "pay re-fixation"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension and Recovery of Excess Payment. Employer's Order Reducing Pay Fixed at Retirement and Recovering Excess Amount Set Aside as Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Vijay Sambrao Bharati, a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of his employer that reduced the pay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Excess Salary Recovery Dispute; Sets Aside Interest Award in Retired Employee's Case. Recovery of Excess Salary Held Impermissible Absent Misrepresentation or Undertaking on the Eve of Retirement, Aligning with Principles Against Hardship.

The High Court of Madras adjudicated a writ appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging a single judge's order that had directed refund of exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KSAT Order Quashing Recovery of Pay Fixation Benefits from Commercial Tax Officers. Recovery of excess pay without fault of employee held impermissible under Karnataka Civil Services Rules.

The State of Karnataka and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Salary from Retired Head Teacher Due to Delay and Lack of Misrepresentation. Recovery of overpayment made to a retired employee after a lapse of 4 years 11 months from retirement is unsustainable in law.

The petitioner, Donald Daniel Ferreira, was initially appointed as a Teacher in respondent no.9 school on 1 August 1990 and later appointed as Head Te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition by Directing Consideration of Representation for Pay Refixation Under Article 226. Retired Special Grade Lab Assistant's Request for Revision of Pay and Retirement Benefits as per Government Order is to be Considered by Respondents Within Four Weeks.

The writ petition was filed by a retired Special Grade Lab Assistant employed in a Government Polytechnic, seeking a writ of mandamus against the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking Consideration of Representation for Pay Revision. Court Directs Respondents to Consider Representation Within Four Weeks Without Going Into Merits.

The petitioner, M.F.Thangaraja, a Special Grade Lab Assistant, approached the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Exclusion of Assistant Superintendent from Justice Shetty Commission Benefits. Government Resolution dated 8.3.2013 and letter dated 30.10.2014 quashed to the extent they exclude the petitioner from pay revision benefits.

The petitioner, Amanulla Khan Pathan, an Assistant Superintendent of Civil Court (Junior Division), Deoni, filed a writ petition challenging a letter ...