Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking Consideration of Representation for Pay Revision. Court Directs Respondents to Consider Representation Within Four Weeks Without Going Into Merits.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M.F.Thangaraja, a Special Grade Lab Assistant, approached the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking a writ of mandamus. The grievance was that the respondents – the Government of Tamil Nadu, the Commissioner of Technical Education, and the Principal of Government Polytechnic, Tuticorin District – had not considered his representation dated 20.01.2025. The representation prayed for refixation of his scale of pay in the post of Special Grade Lab Assistant as per G.O.Ms.No.314 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 22.07.2013, and for revision of his retirement benefits. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the authorities had failed to act, while the Government Advocate appearing for the respondents did not contest the limited relief sought. The court, without going into the merits of the case, noted that the only prayer was for a direction to consider the representation. In the interest of justice, the court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, strictly in accordance with law. The court made no order as to costs, thereby not deciding the substantive rights of either party but ensuring timely administrative consideration of the petitioner’s claim.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Revision - Consideration of Representation - G.O.Ms.No.314, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - Petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct respondents to refix scale of pay of petitioner in post of Special Grade Lab Assistant as per G.O.Ms.No.314 dated 22.07.2013 - Court without going into merits directed respondents to consider and pass orders on representation dated 20.01.2025 within four weeks - Held that direction to consider representation meets ends of justice (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2025 for refixation of pay scale as per G.O.Ms.No.314 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 22.07.2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2025 within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, in accordance with law. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus for consideration of representation
  • government orders for pay revision
  • no merits decided
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • 1950
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 281

W.P.(MD)No.3789 of 2025

2025-02-12

Battu Devanand

K.Vinoharan, T.Amjad Khan

M.F.Thangaraja

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Finance (Pay Cell) Department; 2.The Commissioner of Technical Education; 3.The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Tuticorin District.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking mandamus to direct respondents to refix scale of pay.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks refixation of pay in the post of Special Grade Lab Assistant as per G.O.Ms.No.314 and revision of retirement benefits.

Filing Reason

Respondents failed to consider representation for pay revision.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2025 for refixation of pay scale as per G.O.Ms.No.314.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contends that his representation for pay revision and retirement benefits has not been considered and requests the Court to direct respondents to consider it.

Ratio Decidendi

When a writ petition seeks a direction to consider a representation, the court may, without going into merits, direct the authorities to consider the representation within a stipulated time to meet the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The only grievance raised by the petitioner in this Writ Petition is to consider his representation dated 20.01.2025 submitted to the respondents, seeking to refix the scale of pay of the petitioner in the post of Special Grade Lab Assistant as per G.O.Ms.No.314 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 22.07.2013. Considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner to direct the respondents to consider his representation dated 20.01.2025, in our considered view it is appropriate and reasonable to dispose of this writ petition without going into the merits of the case with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 20.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law within a stipulated time, to meet the ends of justice.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.3789 of 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The petition came up for hearing on 12.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition by Directing Consideration of Representation for Pay Refixation Under Article 226. Retired Special Grade Lab Assistant's Request for Revision of Pay and Retirement Benefits as per Government Order is to be ...