Search Results for "ostensible owner"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting the Rights of the Appellant: Court Rules Against Bonafide Purchasers in the Doctrine of Lis Pendens Case. Rejection of Defence and Upholding of Decree in a Property Dispute

The proceedings and judgment of an appeal filed before a court, challenging a judgment and order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 03.10....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Eviction Suit Between Sisters — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Ownership of Suit Property Vested in Plaintiff as Title Holder, and Defendants Failed to Prove Benami Transaction or License.

The case involves a dispute between two sisters over a residential property in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Vishala Bokapatna Laxman, filed a suit for evict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Coparcenary Rights and Validity of Sale Deeds. The Court held that property inherited under Mitakshara law remains coparcenary, and a coparcener by birth can challenge alienations without legal necessity.

The present civil appeal arises from a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Village Khangarh, District Ferozepur, Punjab. The appellant, A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Licence Violation. Claim under Section 163-A is no-fault liability; insurer cannot avoid payment on ground of driver lacking licence.

The case arises from a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by the legal representatives of Babasaheb Wankhede, wh...