Search Results for "officiation"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Seniority Dispute Among Teachers — Continuous Officiation from Date of Acquiring Prescribed Qualification is Criterion. Petitioner who possessed H.Sc. D.Ed on appointment date held senior over respondent who acquired B.Ed later.

The petitioner, Satish Ramchandra Kamdi, and respondent No.5, Ankush Kothiramji Wase, were both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a middle school run...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.

The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Inter Se Seniority Dispute Among Teachers Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 — Seniority Determined by Date of Entry into Category Based on Qualifications

The dispute in this appeal pertains to the inter se seniority of the appellant and the 5th respondent, both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a secon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre. Education Officer's Order Declaring Respondent No.4 as Senior and Entitled to Head Master Post Upheld Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Ed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order on Seniority and Promotions in MEPS Act Case. Seniority of teachers in aided schools must be determined based on continuous service in the cadre, not on the date of acquiring higher qualifications.

The petitioner, Chagan s/o Namdeorao Athawale, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the primary section of a school run by respondent No.2 on 1 Au...