Search Results for "narcotics"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 22(c) and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove supply or conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Kumar Gupta, was accused no.2 in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The prosecution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 and Doubtful Chain of Custody. LSD Recovery Allegation Fails as Prosecution Could Not Establish That the Seized Substance Was the Same as That Tested by the Chemical Analyser.

The appellant, Roque @ Rocky Fernandes, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, North Goa, Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No.22/2015 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Sections 8(c) read with Section 20(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside for failure to comply with Sections 42 and 50.

The appellants, Mangalsingh @ Mangesh Chatursingh Onavale, Ambadas Tukaram Pawar, and Sunil Ranjit Mohite @ Dada, were convicted by the NDPS Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of LSD and Charas Below Commercial Quantity. Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Attracted as Recovered Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity.

The applicant, Hitesh Hemant Malhotra, was arrested on 8 June 2019 for offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psy...