Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of LSD and Charas Below Commercial Quantity. Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Attracted as Recovered Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Hitesh Hemant Malhotra, was arrested on 8 June 2019 for offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection with Crime No.153/2019 registered at Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane. On his personal search, 10 square pieces of paper containing LSD drops were recovered, and subsequently, from his house, 13 pieces of brown paper containing LSD drops and 970 gms of charas were recovered. The applicant filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, contending that the quantity of contraband recovered was less than commercial quantity, and therefore the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not applicable. He also submitted that he had no criminal antecedents and that the investigation was complete. The State opposed the bail application. The court, after hearing both sides, held that since the recovered quantity was less than commercial quantity, Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply. Considering the applicant's clean record and the completion of investigation, the court granted bail subject to conditions, including furnishing a PR bond of Rs.25,000 with one or two sureties, and reporting to the police station once a month.

Headnote

A) Narcotic Drugs - Bail - Section 37 NDPS Act - Quantity Less Than Commercial - Applicant was found in possession of 10 square pieces of paper containing LSD drops and 970 gms of charas, which is less than commercial quantity - Court held that rigors of Section 37 are not attracted and applicant, having no criminal antecedents, is entitled to bail - Bail granted with conditions (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the NDPS Act when the quantity of contraband recovered is less than commercial quantity, and whether the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act apply.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted. Applicant to be released on furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000 with one or two sureties. Applicant to report to Vartak Nagar Police Station on the first day of every month between 10 am and 12 pm until trial concludes. Bail before the trial court.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Commercial Quantity
  • Section 37
  • LSD
  • Charas
  • Criminal Antecedents
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (12) 69

Criminal Bail Application No. 352 of 2020

2020-12-07

Sandeep K. Shinde

2020:BHC-AS:7724

Mr. Suhas Oak i/by. Mr. Vinod Utekar, Advocate for the applicant; Ms. Prajakta P. Shinde, APP for State

Hitesh Hemant Malhotra

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail application under the NDPS Act.

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband recovered is less than commercial quantity and rigors of Section 37 are not applicable.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested for possession of LSD and charas; he claims the quantity is below commercial quantity and seeks bail.

Issues

Whether the quantity of contraband recovered is less than commercial quantity, thereby not attracting the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering he has no criminal antecedents and investigation is complete.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel argued that the recovered quantity of LSD and charas is less than commercial quantity, so Section 37 does not apply; applicant has no criminal antecedents; investigation is over; presence can be secured by conditions. State opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the quantity of contraband recovered is less than commercial quantity, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not attracted. The applicant, having no criminal antecedents and with investigation complete, is entitled to bail.

Judgment Excerpts

On 8.6.2019 on personal search of the applicant, 10 square pieces of papers containing LSD drops of LSD solutions were found and recovered. Applicant is seeking bail on the ground that quantity of contraband i.e. LSD and charas allegedly found and recovered from the person of applicant and his house was less than the commercial quantity, and therefore rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, are not applicable to the facts of this case.

Procedural History

Applicant was arrested on 8.6.2019 for offences under NDPS Act. He filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, which was reserved on 1.12.2020 and pronounced on 7.12.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 8(c), 20(b), 22(c), 29, 37
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand for Dowry. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of LSD and Charas Below Commercial Quantity. Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Attracted as Recovered Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity.