Search Results for "msedcl"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "msedcl"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Against Labor Court's Overtime Wage Award to Retired Employees of MSEDCL. The Maintainability Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Coverage of Artisan-A Post Under Circular Dated 26.06.2000 Are at Issue.

13 Jun 2025

The present writ petition was filed by the Superintending Engineer and Executive Engineer of Maharashtra Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSE...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Pledge and Corporate Guarantee — Holds That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favored Appellant for Injunction Against Enforcement of Personal Guarantees and Share Pledge Pending Arbitration.

2 May 2023

The appellant, Palmview Investments Overseas Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, filed an appeal against an order of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Preliminary Issue Framing in Employee Status Dispute. The Industrial Court Correctly Held That the Question of Whether an Employee is an 'Employee' Under the MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue as It Involves Mixed Questions of Fact and Law.

10 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (employer), challenged the judgment and order dated November 13, 2021 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reinstatement with Back Wages to Employee Acquitted in Corruption Case, Rejects 'No Work No Pay' During Pendency of State Appeal. Acquittal in criminal case entitles employee to reinstatement with full back wages, and employer cannot deny wages on 'no work no pay' principle when employee is willing to work but prevented by employer.

27 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Laxman Kumbhar, was employed as a Junior Technician with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL)...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Permanent Lok Adalat Award in Electricity Theft Case — MSEDCL Not Obliged to Issue Regular Bills Pending Criminal Proceedings Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. Permanent Lok Adalat lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes involving criminal offences like theft of electricity under Section 22(C) of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

14 Jan 2022

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenged an award passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Aurangabad, in Pre-litiga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Against CGRF Interest Order in Tariff Refund Dispute. Interest on Differential Tariff Amount Not Payable Absent Specific Provision in Regulations or Agreement.

17 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Consumer ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Electrocution Death Due to Hanging Live Wire - Negligence of Electricity Distribution Company Established Under Res Ipsa Loquitur. Court directed MSEDCL to pay Rs. 5 lakhs with interest for failure to maintain electric lines, resulting in death of an agriculturist.

29 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Laxmibai W/o Sainath Danekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes CGRF Order Directing MSEDCL to Provide Supply from Gaothan Feeder — Forum Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the CGRF cannot direct a distribution licensee to provide supply from a specific feeder as such operational decisions are within the licensee's domain.

7 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 6/12/2010 passed by the Consumer Grievance...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)