CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015
9 Feb 2016The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...
Search Results for "money order refused"
2703 result(s) found
Found 2703 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Did Not Show Prejudicial Activity After Release.
7 Mar 2005The petitioner, wife of the detenu Chandrakant Prabhakar Todankar, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
7 Jul 2026The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.
24 Jul 2015The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...
- 121
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.
24 Sep 2025The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...
- 81
High Court
High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.
23 Apr 2014The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Anonymous Complaint and Stale Incidents Insufficient to Sustain Preventive Detention. The court held that reliance on an unverified anonymous complaint and two criminal cases where the detenu was on bail did not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.
25 Feb 2005The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged a detention order dated 25-2-2004 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous A...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
26 Oct 2018The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Delivery Warrant in Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Order XXI Rule 35 CPC — Judgment Debtors Entitled to Notice Before Delivery of Possession. The court held that failure to issue notice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC before ordering delivery of possession violates natural justice and renders the execution proceedings void.
16 Jun 2022The petitioners, Dada Balu Rooge and Smt. Vasundara, were judgment debtors in Execution Petition No.73/2014 pending before the Principal Senior Civil ...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.
14 Jun 2010The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...
- 42
