Search Results for "mineral development"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "mineral development"

337 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 337 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated in Lease Deed Cannot Be Enforced as Condition of Lease.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, S.K. Suresh, held a quarry lease for steatite (a minor mineral) granted on 10-11-2010 under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Royalty Dispute Over Brick Earth Extraction — Ownership Presumption Under Section 42 of Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and Royalty Levy Under Mines and Mineral (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 Upheld. The Court held that royalty on minor minerals is leviable irrespective of land ownership and that the High Court erred in decreeing the suit without considering the presumption of ownership in favour of the State.

20 Feb 2025

The State of Punjab and its officers appealed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had decreed the suits filed by brick kil...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Validity of Rule 5 of Goa Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2002 — Declares Quarry Lease Valid Despite Deletion of Chapter III. Rule 5, which deleted Chapter III of the Goa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1985, is held intra vires Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, as the State Government has power to make rules for grant of quarry leases in respect of land belonging to private persons.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the constitutional v...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Central Empowered Committee to Identify Mining Leases Operating in Violation of Environmental and Forest Laws in Odisha. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Illegal Mining and Directs Preparation of List of Defaulting Lessees for Interim Relief Under Article 32.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed by Common Cause and Prafulla Samantra, alleging rampant illegal mining in the Keonj...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.

27 May 2022

The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Demand for Royalty on Earth Excavated for Plot Development — Notification Exempting Royalty on Earth Used for Same Plot Development Applies Retrospectively. The court held that the exemption notification dated 5 May 2015 under the Maharashtra Minor Minerals Extraction (Development and Regulation Rules) 2013 applies retrospectively, and the order demanding royalty without hearing violates natural justice.

16 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Agile Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate development company, owned lands at revenue village Balkum in Thane district, includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)