Search Results for "metro rail project"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Conservation Case Against Railway Land Development. NGT's Finding That Land Is Not Forest Land Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Upheld, as Appellants Failed to Prove Land Met Statutory Definition and Provided Unauthorized Evidence.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dismissing an original application challenging a Request for Proposal (RFP) issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee Due to Lack of Safety Measures. Employer and Principal Employer Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased Chinnaswamy, who died due to electrocution on 14.08.2013 while workin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Metro Rail Soil Investigation Dispute; Undertaking to Mitigate Damage Renders Petition Unnecessary. Court Holds That Public Project Undertaking Provides Sufficient Protection for Affected Occupants, Making Further Judicial Intervention Inappropriate.

The appellant, Meston Education and Development Association (P) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 31.07.2024 issued by the Chenna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tender Conditions as Misconceived. Tender conditions requiring prior experience and financial capacity are valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, four private limited companies engaged in infrastructure development, filed a writ petition challenging the terms of a tender floated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows L&T's Challenge to Tender Rejection by MMRDA, Directs Fresh Evaluation of Technical Bids. The court set aside the rejection of technical bid for Package 1 as arbitrary and directed expeditious evaluation for Package 2.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) against the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Rejection of Bid for Suppression of Material Facts in Public Tender. Bidder's Failure to Disclose FIR and Charge Sheet for Bridge Collapse Constitutes Fraudulent Practice Under N.I.T. Clauses.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against a High Court judgment that had set aside the rejection of U.P. State B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award by MHADA — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Bidder's Challenge to Summary Rejection of Technical Bid Fails as Evaluation Was Based on Tender Conditions and No Prejudice Was Caused.

The petitioners, ACC India Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...