Search Results for "mentally disabled"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Sections Conviction. Acquittal based on flawed procedural adherence, delayed reporting, and lack of corroborative medical evidence.

1. Introduction The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, overturned the conviction of Suresh Kisan Surwade, who was convicted under Sections 452, 377, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Syed Vaseem, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, for the murder of one person under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PoCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rahul Dagadu Sirsat, was convicted by the Special Judge, Akot, under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (PoCSO A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Continuation of Employment Under Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities Act for Bedridden Employee. Employee Suffering Complete Paralysis and Unable to Comprehend Cannot Be Considered 'Disabled' Under the Act for Purpose of Retaining Employment.

The petitioner, Amrut Yeshwant Mate, was an employee of Zilla Parishad, Bhandara. He suffered paralysis and became completely bedridden, unable to und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds City Civil Court is District Court Under Mental Health Act, 1987 — Reference to Larger Bench Resolved. The High Court in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction is not the District Court for the purposes of the Mental Health Act, 1987.

The case involved a reference to a larger bench to resolve a conflict between two learned single judges of the Bombay High Court regarding the interpr...