Search Results for "major port trusts act"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Port Trust for Refusing Remission of Demurrage Charges. Port Trust's Own Guidelines for Remission When Detention by Customs for Bonafide Operations Must Be Followed.

The petitioner, M/s. Rasiklal Kantilal & Co., a partnership firm engaged in import of goods including zinc ingots and copper wire bars, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Limitation for Suit Against Port Trust Under Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Plaintiffs' Notice Under Section 120 Sent More Than Five Years After Lease Expiry and Accrual of Cause of Action.

The suit was instituted by Kewal Kishan Aggarwal and others against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai seeking renewal of seven leases that e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Ruling in Concession Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Consortium Members as They Were Not Signatories to the Concession Agreement.

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, a major port constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, issued a glo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Reservation in Promotion Policy of Mumbai Port Trust; Office Memorandum Dated 21 January 2002 Under Scrutiny. Petitioners Allege Violation of M. Nagaraj Principles and 100% Reservation for SC/ST in Office Superintendent Cadre.

The writ petition was filed by the Mumbai Port Trust Non SC/ST Employees Association, an association registered under the Trade Unions Act representin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...