Search Results for "lock-out"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Eviction Dispute Due to Lack of Perversity in Concurrent Findings. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 not to be used to reappreciate evidence; landlord failed to establish bona fide requirement under Rent Act.

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute where the petitioners (landlord's legal heirs) sought eviction of the respondents (tenants) from a propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Trust and Coverage Dispute. Majority Award Upheld as Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, The New India Insurance Company Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 July 2009 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Regularization of Contract Labour as Permanent Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Genuineness of Contract Labour System, and Concurrent Findings of Fact by Industrial Tribunal and Appellate Authority Were Not Perverse.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Western Coalfields Limited (the employer) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Proposed Strike by Petroleum Workmen's Unions Illegal and Unjustified. Strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011 held invalid for non-compliance with mandatory conciliation provisions under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a public limited company and a public utility service, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 o...