Bombay High Court Declares Proposed Strike by Petroleum Workmen's Unions Illegal and Unjustified. Strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011 held invalid for non-compliance with mandatory conciliation provisions under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a public limited company and a public utility service, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the proposed strike by the respondent Unions (Petroleum Workmen's Union, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Process Technicians and Analysts' Union, Bharat Petroleum Technician and Non Technical Employees Association, Bharat Petroleum Corporation (Refinery) Employees Union, Petroleum Employee's Union, and Bharat Petroleum Karmachari Union) is illegal and unjustified. The respondent Unions gave strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011. The matter was discussed before the Conciliation Officer. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, held that the strike was illegal as the mandatory requirements of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 were not complied with. The court declared the proposed strike illegal and unjustified and restrained the respondent Unions from going on strike.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Strike in Public Utility Service - Section 22 - Illegality of Strike - Strike notice must be given within six weeks before strike and conciliation proceedings must be held - The respondent Unions gave strike notices but the matter was discussed before the Conciliation Officer and the court found that the strike was illegal as the mandatory requirements of Section 22 were not complied with - Held that the strike is illegal and unjustified (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proposed strike by the respondent Unions pursuant to strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011 is illegal and unjustified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court declared the proposed strike by the respondent Unions pursuant to strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011 as illegal and unjustified.

Law Points

  • Strike notice must comply with Section 22 of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Conciliation proceedings mandatory before strike
  • Public utility service strike requires notice and conciliation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (08) 37

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1472 OF 2011 and WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1517 OF 2011

2011-08-02

A.M. Khanwilkar, R.Y. Ganoo

Mr. J.P. Cama, Sr. Counsel with Mr. R.S. Pai & Mr. Mahesh S. Londha i/b. Sanjay Udeshi & Co., Ms. Jane Cox for the Respondents

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Petroleum Workmen's Union, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Process Technicians and Analysts' Union, Bharat Petroleum Technician and Non Technical Employees Association, Bharat Petroleum Corporation (Refinery) Employees Union, Union of India through Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Petroleum Employee's Union, Bharat Petroleum Karmachari Union

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration that proposed strike is illegal and unjustified.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the proposed strike by respondent Unions is illegal and unjustified.

Filing Reason

Respondent Unions gave strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011, and the petitioner Corporation sought to prevent the strike.

Issues

Whether the proposed strike by the respondent Unions is illegal and unjustified.

Submissions/Arguments

Heard Counsel for the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The strike is illegal as the mandatory requirements of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 were not complied with.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Corporation seeks declaration that the proposed strike of the respondent Unions, pursuant to the strike notices dated 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011, in the respective matters is illegal and unjustified.

Procedural History

The respondent Unions gave strike notices on 6th July, 2011 and 12th July, 2011. The matter was discussed before the Conciliation Officer. The petitioner filed writ petitions seeking declaration that the strike is illegal. The court heard counsel and passed order on 2nd August, 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 22
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Section 462 Cr.P.C. Bars Quashing on Ground of Want of Jurisdiction. Court holds that even if the complaint was filed at a place without territoria...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Income Tax Department in Determining Applicability of Section 23A to Closely Held Company. Court Holds That Shares Controlled by a De Facto Block Cease to Be Held by Public Under Explanation to Third Proviso to Section 23A of In...