Search Results for "interveners"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Property Owners in Suit Against Municipal Corporation Under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Petitioners claiming ownership of suit property are necessary parties to suit for declaration and injunction against demolition notice.

The petitioners, Pushpendrakumar Keshrilalji Sharma and Makarand Sharad Pande, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against CCI's Investigation Order in Competition Act Case. Broadcasters Challenge Order Under Section 26(1) Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Application of Mind.

Star India Private Limited and Sony Pictures Network India Private Limited filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 July 2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal Against Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Appointing Trustees to Vishwa Punarnirman Sangha Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Question of Maintainability of Appeal Against Administrative Directions Under Section 41‑A Referred to Division Bench

The appeal arose from an order dated 19 May 2016 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Mumbai, in Application No. 74/2015 under Sections 47 and 41...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice. Petition lacks bonafide public interest and is motivated by personal vendetta.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Petition Challenging Appointment of Additional Judge as Abuse of Process. Petition filed by an advocate questioning appointment of Respondent No.7 as additional judge of Bombay High Court held to be trumpery and frivolous.

The petitioner, an advocate practicing in the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto challenging the appointment of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Noon Meal Organizer Appointment. Petitioner sought quashing of District Collector's order and direction for appointment to the post of Noon Meal Organizer at a Panchayat Union Primary School.

The petitioner, a resident of Chinnathathampatti village, had applied for the post of Noon Meal Organiser at the Noon Meal Centre attached to the Panc...