Search Results for "input tax credit reversal"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Reversal.

The petitioner, Niket Bipinbhai Patel, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a show-ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes GST Demand Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Personal Hearing Not Granted Despite Reminders Under Section 75(5) of GST Act. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing Before Confirming ITC Reversal Demand Renders Order Invalid; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner, Aarti Enterprise through Savitaben Brindavan Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging a system-based notice in Form DRC-01A dated 09...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of GST Circulars on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Exempted Supplies. Circulars Clarifying Section 17(2) of CGST Act, 2017 Held Not Ultra Vires as They Merely Interpret Existing Provisions.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged the validity of Circular No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interest on Delayed Refund Under Section 127 of Finance Act, 2019. The court held that the respondents' delay in refunding the amount under the scheme attracts interest liability.

The petitioner, Quant Broking Pvt Ltd, a stock broker and member of various stock exchanges, filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...