Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interest on Delayed Refund Under Section 127 of Finance Act, 2019. The court held that the respondents' delay in refunding the amount under the scheme attracts interest liability.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 96
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Quant Broking Pvt Ltd, a stock broker and member of various stock exchanges, filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019, introduced by the Government of India under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019. The scheme was applicable to various enactments including the Finance Act 2004, 2007, 2015, and 2016. The petitioner's declaration was accepted by the designated committee, which issued a statement under Section 127 of the Finance Act. However, the respondents delayed in refunding the amount paid by the petitioner under the scheme. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking interest on the delayed refund. The court considered the provisions of the scheme and the Finance Act, and held that the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund from the date the amount became due until the date of actual payment. The court also held that the respondents are liable to pay interest for the period of delay in issuing the statement under Section 127. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay interest at the rate specified under the scheme.

Headnote

A) Sabka Vishwas Scheme - Interest on Delayed Refund - Section 127 Finance Act, 2019 - The petitioner filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019, which was accepted. The designated committee issued a statement under Section 127 of the Finance Act, 2019, but there was a delay in refunding the amount paid. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund from the date the amount became due until the date of actual payment, as per the provisions of the scheme and the Finance Act. (Paras 1-12)

B) Sabka Vishwas Scheme - Delay in Issuance of Statement - Section 127 Finance Act, 2019 - The respondents delayed in issuing the statement under Section 127, which caused the petitioner to wait for the refund. The court held that the respondents are liable to pay interest for the period of delay, as the scheme aims to provide a quick and efficient resolution of legacy disputes. (Paras 13-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund of the amount paid under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019, and whether the respondents are liable to pay interest for the period of delay in issuing the statement under Section 127 of the Finance Act, 2019.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to pay interest on the delayed refund at the rate specified under the scheme from the date the amount became due until the date of actual payment.

Law Points

  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019
  • Finance Act 2019
  • Section 127
  • Interest on delayed refund
  • Designated Committee
  • Declaration under scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (06) 17

WRIT PETITION NO. 897 OF 2020

2022-06-06

K.R. SHRIRAM, PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN

2022:BHC-OS:4505-DB

Mr. Gopal Mundra a/w Mr. Parth Parikh i/b Economic Laws Practice for Petitioner, Mr. P. S. Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. J. B. Mishra, Ms Sangeeta Yadav and Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh for Respondents

Quant Broking Pvt Ltd

Union of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, Designated Committee under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019, Principal Commissioner CGST & CX Mumbai South Commissionerate, Assistant Commissioner of CGST & CX Mumbai South Commissionerate

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking interest on delayed refund under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks interest on the delayed refund of the amount paid under the scheme.

Filing Reason

Respondents delayed in refunding the amount paid by the petitioner under the scheme after the declaration was accepted.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme? Whether the respondents are liable to pay interest for the delay in issuing the statement under Section 127 of the Finance Act, 2019?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the respondents delayed in refunding the amount and therefore interest should be paid. Respondents argued that the scheme does not provide for interest on delayed refunds.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019, the designated committee is required to issue a statement under Section 127 of the Finance Act, 2019, and any delay in refunding the amount paid under the scheme entitles the declarant to interest. The scheme aims to provide a quick resolution, and delay in refund attracts interest liability.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is a member of various stock exchanges including National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange and undertakes trading in shares, currencies and derivatives instruments as a stock broker for its clients. Petitioner had filed such declaration under the scheme. The declaration has been accepted but according to petitioner, respondents have delayed in refunding the amount.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme in 2019. The declaration was accepted, but the respondents delayed in refunding the amount. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition in 2020 seeking interest on the delayed refund.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance Act, 2019: 122, 123, 125, 126, 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Deprecates Malegaon Municipal Corporation for Dereliction of Duty in Removing Unauthorized Constructions. Purchase Notice under Section 127 MRTP Act Not Adjudicated Due to Pending Inter Se Disputes.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Institutionalizes Central Empowered Committee as Permanent Statutory Body Under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Court approved a notification constituting the CEC for monitoring compliance of environmental orders and directed th...