Search Results for "input service"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "input service"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Dispute — Holds That Credit on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Goods Is Not Permissible Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. The Court Resolves Conflict Between Earlier Decisions by Distinguishing MODVAT and CENVAT Schemes, Denying Credit for LSHS Used as Fuel in Producing Exempted Fertilizer.

3 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court to resolve an apparent conflict between two decisions: Commissioner of Central Ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Levy of Entry Tax on Natural Gas Under Maharashtra Entry Tax Act, 2002 — Holds That Natural Gas Is Not 'Goods' for Entry Tax Purposes When Supplied Through Pipelines

27 Jul 2018

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies (Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., Smartchem Technologies Ltd., Emp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise. Classification of plastic components under Chapter 39 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 upheld over Chapter 84.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of plastic components used in textile machinery. The Commissioner of Cen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cenvat Credit Case for Mobile Phones. Service Tax Paid on Mobile Phones Used by Employees Held Eligible for Cenvat Credit Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Mar 2015

The case is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

7 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in GST Provisional Attachment Case, Reversing High Court's Dismissal on Maintainability Grounds. The High Court Erred in Dismissing Writ Petition Solely Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 107 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Without Examining Merits of Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 83.

20 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 1 January 2021 by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, which dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)